Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €29.22 vs €215.49
- Up to 64% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.52 vs €1.44 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 168% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 150 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
36%
Price, €
€215.49
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |