Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 and FX-8320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
