Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 188 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-4300 - 99 vs 98 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |