Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €20.59 vs €430.01
- Up to 95% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9900KF - €0.04 vs €0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than FX-4100 - 543 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |