Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3211 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €18.39 vs €349.59
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 69% better in F1 23 than FX-4100 - 244 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77864 minutes ago
Buy for €349.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |