Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €19.79 vs €228.23
- Up to 90% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13400 - €0.18 vs €1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 15% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-4100 - 125 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €19.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for €228.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |