Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - €19.39 vs €316.35
- Up to 93% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-12600 - €0.11 vs €1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than FX-4100 - 189 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
176
93.12169312169311%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5662 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
6.58682634730539%
Price, €
€316.35
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €316.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |