Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €20.59 vs €149.5
- Up to 84% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-12400F - €0.03 vs €0.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Minecraft than FX-4100 - 801 vs 594 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Buy for €149.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |