Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €19.79 vs €299.16
- Up to 89% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-10600K - €0.14 vs €1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 23 than FX-4100 - 238 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €19.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
11%
Price, €
€299.16
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |