Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 902 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 96 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7642 - 205 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7642
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7642 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 4 |
96 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
