Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 234 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than EPYC 75F3 - 192 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 125 vs 280 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€427.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €427.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |