Key Differences
In short — EPYC 75F3 outperforms Core i5-4570R on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 75F3 is 2843 days newer than Core i5-4570R.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4570R - 174 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570R - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570R
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
EPYC 75F3
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i5-4570R
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4570R
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
895
49.01423877327492%
Multi-Core
2744
16.699123661148978%
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570R |
|---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Crystal Well |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris? Pro 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
