Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 842 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7551P - 179 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 165 vs 180 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Naples | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |