Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 177 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than EPYC 7551P - 198 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |