Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930T - 184 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Naples | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
