Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 728 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7551 - 102 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Naples | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
