Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 1077 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 181 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 54 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13814 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
Milan | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
200 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |