Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7302P - 139 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€528.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €528.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |