Buy on Amazon
€318.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 267 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7302P - 113 vs 102 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€318.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 988 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using EPYC 7302P or Core i9-10900KF
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
83 FPS
€60.28/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€5,003.16
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
