Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 671 days newer than Core i3-8100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-8100 - 288 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
