Buy on Amazon
€88.23
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 587 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 4% better in Hogwarts Legacy than EPYC 7302P - 87 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €88.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
