Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 155 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7302P - 213 vs 169 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€789
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |