Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7282 - 136 vs 104 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |