Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2623 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3470S - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
