Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 3132 days newer than Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2500K - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
