Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240T - 123 vs 115 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
46.70846394984326%
Multi-Core
971
49.164556962025316%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |