Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 28% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 186 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |