Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 237 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €80.0 vs €2846.24
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Saints Row than Athlon 3000G - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76910 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2846.24
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.824773413897276%
Multi-Core
1975
13.546882502229234%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |