Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 464 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 170 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.10169491525424%
Multi-Core
1975
27.35078244010525%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |