Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1216 days newer than Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 200GE - 212 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
35.01378495470658%
Multi-Core
1857
13.369330453563716%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
