Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 611 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 115 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
68.39145106861643%
Multi-Core
1043
56.16585891222402%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
