Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 677 days newer than Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 200GE - 590 vs 495 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 64 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
53.716012084592144%
Multi-Core
1857
12.737499142602374%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
