Key Differences
In short — SYSTEMTREFF High-End outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Captiva is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Captiva - 85 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 29% cheaper than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €2509.0 vs €3555.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Starfield than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - €37.45 vs €41.82 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
160th Variation
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€41.82/FPS
89%
Price, €
€3555
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5964 minutes ago
Buy for €2,509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
160th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
160th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
48%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
160th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
95%
Multi-Core
20148
95%
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
