Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — SYSTEMTREFF outperforms the cheaper Megaport High End on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport High End - 189 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport High End - €7.86 vs €10.38 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport High End Gaming PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than SYSTEMTREFF - €1339.00 vs €1484.90
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
186th Variation
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1484.9
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,484.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 501 minutes ago
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 507 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
186th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
186th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
431 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
718.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
33%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
186th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
90%
CPU Winner
16th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
92%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC | vs | Megaport High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| Radeon RX 7900 GRE | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
