Key Differences
In short — STGAubron outperforms Skytech Archangel on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming PC
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Skytech Archangel - 88 vs 73 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
51%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-10700F
2.9 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1636
100%
Multi-Core
7237
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 3600
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1614
99%
Multi-Core
6912
96%
STGAubron Gaming PC | vs | Skytech Archangel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 3600 |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |