Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper shinobee High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing shinobee High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of shinobee High End Gaming PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than Megaport - €849.00 vs €2339.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - €4.22 vs €4.91 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 137% better in Counter-Strike 2 than shinobee High End - 476 vs 201 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
FPS
201
42%
Value, €/FPS
€4.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€849
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 342 minutes ago
Buy for €2,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-10700F
2.9 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1612
63%
Multi-Core
7231
52%
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
shinobee High End Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
