Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Mini PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Megaport - €534.65 vs €919.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €14.07 vs €14.82 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 63% better in Dead Space than Mini - 62 vs 38 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
38
61.29032258064516%
Value, €/FPS
€14.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€534.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €534.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74664 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.82/FPS
94.93927125506073%
Price, €
€919
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
82.5322391559203%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
53.065326633165824%
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 6900HX
3.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1979
93.3050447901933%
Multi-Core
9532
97.97512591222119%
18th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Mini PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon 680M | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
