Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Mini PC
- Up to 77% cheaper than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - €499.0 vs €2199.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing World of Warcraft than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - €4.66 vs €10.13 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 103% better in World of Warcraft than Mini - 217 vs 107 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.13/FPS
46.00197433366239%
Price, €
€2199
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
35.55555555555556%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
19.047619047619047%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 6900HX
3.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1979
71.31531531531532%
Multi-Core
9532
54.99653819524579%
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Mini PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
Radeon 680M | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |