Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 474% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 201 vs 35 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
26th Variation
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2669
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,669 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
99th Variation
26th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
99th Variation
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
8%
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
480 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |