Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 238 vs 224 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 2789 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2780 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
49th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
49th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
66%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
49th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
