Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3100% better in Starfield than Memory - 32 vs 1 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
30th Variation
FPS
32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€43.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6931 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
45th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
45th Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
32%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6400 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
