Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Memory - 307 vs 282 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Memory - €1249.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.07 vs €6.02 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
81st Variation
FPS
282
91.85667752442997%
Value, €/FPS
€6.02/FPS
67.60797342192691%
Price, €
€1699
73%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2099 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
81st Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
81st Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
91.34826526130875%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
95.1923076923077%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
71.31809011432414%
Multi-Core
9729
48.28767123287671%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
