Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than Megaport - €979.0 vs €2299.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €10.41 vs €10.84 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 126% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 212 vs 94 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15028 minutes ago
Buy for €2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |