Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Megaport - €1139.0 vs €1399.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €8.97 vs €10.14 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 138 vs 127 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
72nd Variation
FPS
127
92.02898550724638%
Value, €/FPS
€8.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3722 minutes ago
30th Variation
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.14/FPS
88.46153846153845%
Price, €
€1399
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
72nd Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
72nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
73.40487238979118%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
91.36636636636638%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
99.45230488361479%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |