Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 85% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 196 vs 106 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 55% cheaper than Memory - €919.0 vs €2049.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €8.67 vs €10.45 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7217 minutes ago
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i7-13700K
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2840
100%
Multi-Core
17611
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
