Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 227 vs 205 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 2975 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
4th Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
78%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
96%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
