Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 55% cheaper than Captiva - €1039.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Captiva - €7.75 vs €8.92 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 93% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Memory - 259 vs 134 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
64th Variation
FPS
134
51.737451737451735%
Value, €/FPS
€7.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1039
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,039 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74907 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74895 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
64th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
64th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
63.79310344827586%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
40.40549169859515%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
64th Variation
Ryzen 5 3600
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1597
53.68067226890756%
Multi-Core
6884
35.790787147759175%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |