Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 34% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 114 vs 85 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Memory - €729.0 vs €1299.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €8.58 vs €11.39 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
53rd Variation
FPS
114
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.39/FPS
75.32923617208077%
Price, €
€1299
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5006 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
85
74.56140350877193%
Value, €/FPS
€8.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€729
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
53rd Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
53rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
42.68768768768769%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
56.183326748320816%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
53rd Variation
Core i7-10700F
null-core
Single-Core
1612
79.44800394282898%
Multi-Core
7231
84.68204707811219%
11th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
null-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |