Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X10 High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X10 High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 29% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ERAZER Engineer X10 High End - 202 vs 156 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than Memory - €899.99 vs €1779.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Memory - €5.77 vs €8.81 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 739 minutes ago
FPS
156
77%
Value, €/FPS
€5.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€899.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
55%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
