Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 212% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 200 vs 64 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 756 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2439
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 743 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
49th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
49th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11%
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
48th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
